SSA '01: Abstracts Online
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF
PALEOSEISMIC FEATURES IN THE
SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF
THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE IN
EASTERN ARKANSAS
AL-SHUKRI, H.J., LEMMER, R.E.,
MAHDI, H.H., and CONNELLY, J.B.,
Department of Earth Sciences,
University of Arkansas at Little
Rock, 2801 South University
Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204,
alshukri@seismo.ualr.edu
In the past 25 years our
understanding of earthquake hazards in the New Madrid seismic
zone (NMSZ) has been profoundly
changed by results of paleoseismic investigations.
Hundreds of earthquake-related
features have been systematically surveyed and examined.
However, most investigations
have been concentrated within the area of enhanced seismicity
terminating near Marked Tree,
Arkansas. Numerous large (up to 107m X 55m) liquefaction
features resembling those within
the NMSZ have been discovered 90 to 100 km
south-southwest of Marked Tree,
Arkansas. Following an aerial reconnaissance survey of
east central Arkansas, a
detailed subsurface investigation was conducted at three sites, two
near Marianna, Arkansas (Nancy 1
and Nancy 2) and one near Parkin, Arkansas (Parkin
1). One trench was
excavated at Nancy 1 and two trenches were excavated at Nancy 2.
Each of the excavations exposed
a fine-medium grained sand blow deposit overlying a thick,
plastic clay layer. The sand
blows are fed by numerous vertical to shallow dipping sand dikes
<1cm to 20cm thick.
Forty-five near vertical dikes were logged at Nancy 1 whereas only
3-5 dikes were
exposed in the trenches at Nancy 2. Parkin 1 was also trenched to
investigate a 1.5 km long linear
feature. The lineament trends N56°E and has a ground
surface that is 2.75 meters
higher to the southeast. No fault was seen in the trench; however,
sand and clay layers tilted to
the northwest were exposed suggesting possible faulting. A
seismic survey is planned to
investigate this possibility. The size of the liquefaction features
and the distance of 100 km from
the active NMSZ require either a major New Madrid
earthquake or a more local
seismogenic source. In either case, the seismic hazard in the
region may be underestimated.